Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

Yahoo Singapore News - ‘Relook ways to handle religion and race issues’ - Andrew Loh

‘Relook ways to handle religion and race issues’

By Andrew Loh | SingaporeScene – 13 hours ago
Government should revisit how it handles race and religion issues. (Yahoo! photo)
Government should revisit how it handles race and religion issues. (Yahoo! photo)
The ruling People's Action Party's (PAP's) views on matters racial and religious are no secret. These, to them, are sensitive, perhaps ultra-sensitive, issues which are best left alone.
The PAP's stance is that Singaporeans should trust it to be rational and fair, and to have faith that it knows how members of each race and religion feel, and that it will act in their best interests.
In the past, perhaps Singaporeans, who were pre-occupied with making a living and in any case had no avenues to voice their unhappiness or frustrations, went along with whatever the governmentdecided. But this didn't mean the issues — along with the unhappy sentiments about them — had vaporised into thin air.
Instead, because such matters cut right to the heart of one's very identity as a citizen and indeed as a human being, the feelings never left. They never could have.
With new media coming to the fore, Singaporeans now have a channel to speak their minds — even and especially on these once-taboo subjects.
2011 will perhaps be remembered as the year the matters of race and religion were given a much-needed airing. The sentiments which had simmered underneath finally rose to prominence. And while debates and disagreements abound in each case or incident of racism or perceived racism which arose this year, the government now has an opportunity to relook the way it has handled these matters.
Where to start
And the place to start is the heart of government — the Cabinet.
When we speak of the nucleus of government, inevitably we will conclude that there is one person whose views hold sway, and has for 50 years, by the sheer force of this person's personality. We are, of course, talking about former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew.
A pragmatic realist, some call him, and not inaccurately. Having emerged as leader of Singaporesociety from the ashes of racial riots in our early days, Lee's views on life — and in particular, the matters of race and religion — are shaped by personal experiences. If there is one person who would be more acutely aware and deeply wary of the potentially catastrophic consequences of racial and religious sentiments run amok, it would be Lee.
Yet, it could also be said that it is precisely of the profound impact past experiences had on him that his policies, when he assumed prime ministership, were crafted with fear of extreme circumstances in mind.
In short, while wanting to prevent similar altercations between the races and religions from breaking out, it instead resulted in policies of distrust, particularly affecting the minority groups among us. And with the government wielding the heavy hand of various legal and state instruments to keep the citizenry in check, unhappiness was forced underground and left to simmer, waiting for an outlet.
As long as Singapore continues to live up to its potential of being an "Asian tiger economy", with its citizens enjoying materialistic trappings, things will be fine. Or so the belief goes.
But all it will take to collapse this superficial house of cards is the chilling echoes of suppressed emotions.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong chose to ostensibly break from the past after the General Election in May when he reconstituted his Cabinet, which saw the senior Lee stepping down. An "epochal" change, PM Lee said. And indeed it is — indeed it could be.
Questions to consider
While much disgust and impassioned criticisms were expressed towards those who had infringed and trespassed onto the out-of-bounds spheres of race and religion in recent times, these incidents have also opened up an opportunity for the government — and indeed all of society — to take a long hard look at itself and consider some questions:
  • What are the areas which discriminate against the non-Chinese races?
  • Have our policies of distrust served us and even if they have, should they not be dismantled?
  • Have we allowed the non-Chinese races to have avenues to speak their minds freely and openly, so that we could all understand what they face and address these collectively? Or have we left them to their own devices?
  • Have we heard them but dismissed their concerns?
  • Have we treated them right — that is, as equal fellow Singaporeans, in all aspects and in all respects?
There are many more questions, of course, but I will leave them to perhaps another time.
On the government's part, there needs to be some intense and in-depth soul-searching among its ranks, especially in Cabinet. It should start with two areas:

  • Are the Cabinet's views on race and religion based on wrong assumptions, false suspicions, and fear of the extreme, even if these are predicated on pragmatic and realist considerations or rationalities?
  • A relook at a slew of policies and practices which are discriminatory or seen to be so, to the minority races.

The former can be done within the Cabinet itself, in earnest. The latter should be discussed openly with those most affected by these discriminatory policies. The government should realise that sometimes while policies may make sense intellectually or theoretically, they may not convince emotionally or morally, which are just as important, especially in the arena of race and religion.
In other words, policies may look right, but they may not be right. And this is where perhaps the most intense feelings are directed at — that viscerally and intuitively — Singaporeans, especially those who feel discriminated against, feel these policies and practices are morally wrong.
50 years on, a new generation of Singaporeans has emerged and is ready to look the tiger in the eye, so to speak. They are looking for a new paradigm in how racial and religious matters are handled. Give them a chance. If we are to learn anything from this latest outcry, it is that the time has come to speak honestly, to shine a light on our darkest corners, to see what it shows us and to address these accordingly and honestly.
Let us not be paralysed by our fear and experiences of the past so much so that we would rather bury our heads in the sand, even as the ground under our feet has moved.
Andrew helms publichouse.sg as Editor-in-Chief. His writings have been reproduced in other publications, including the Australian Housing Journal in 2010. He was nominated by Yahoo! Singapore as one of Singapore's most influential media persons in 2011.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 26 December 2011

Robert Ho REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS - Mirror

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 01, 2011

Robert HO REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS

INTRODUCTION:

In every life, whether as President, Prime Minister or a journalist of a small publication, there comes a time when we have to make a deliberate, conscious choice that either affirms our self respect, dignity and righteousness, or we suppress all that is noble in us and choose the other option. This simple document is one of those times. With this document, I urge you to do what is right, not what is politically expedient. I ask that you make this a conscious choice that you will, in years to come, look back with pride and not in guilt. To help you make the right choice, I urge you not to think of tomorrow, or months from now, but a few years from now. In just years, America will have fallen, Asia risen. A new reality would have dawned in which America is no longer a big player, maybe even collapsed with the summer riots of 2011. It will be a future, not that far into the future, in which we Asians will proudly reclaim our place as the centre of the world, which we lost for only about 2 centuries. It may have seemed forever, for human memory is short, but the memories of our civilisations is long, in the thousands of years. If you tick all that you should, you will be proud of your act for decades to come, and your peoples and families will be proud with you. If you discard this document, you will surely have shamed yourself, your country and your people. It is that simple. I hope you make the right choice. My case is so public that it cannot be suppressed forever. Once America is no longer powerful, my story will break out in books, documentaries, films, etc, in dozens of languages. When that day comes, I hope you, by your choice now, will stand on the right side of history. Thank you.

REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS:

A. Please translate this document into your country's language. If you need a free, computer-translation, use Google Translate from this web page:http://translate.google.com.sg/translate_t?q=google&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wT#

B. After you have translated this document, print as many copies as you can and give to everybody whom you think will want to record their Statements to help me. Most importantly, send copies to your Govt ministers, especially your President or Prime Minister, Minsters, etc, and urge them to complete this document. Tell them their personal honour and the honour of your country are at stake.

C. This document has 22 Statements. Please tick ALL the Statements that you know are true and that you agree with. For those Statements that you do not want to be seen as supporting, for whatever reason, for example, for political or fear reasons, please write the English letter “N” for “No” so that nobody can write a tick on it after you have sent it. Thank you.

D. After you have ticked all the Statements that you are willing to support, please mail this document to me. My address is below. Do not translate the address except the last line, which is “REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE” [translate this] . The amount of postage stamp you need to send this letter to Singapore is probably on your Internet. Some countries may also give this information over the telephone.

Mr Robert HO
28 Bukit Batok Street 52
#20-03 Guilin View
Singapore 659248
REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

E. Please write your full name on the line. Please sign your signature on the line. Please fill in your Occupation on the line, for example, “President”; “Prime Minister”; “Minister”; “Journalist”; “Film/TV director”; “Actor/Actress”; etc, etc. Please write your Country on the line. Please also chop on the line if you have an official stamp. Please write the Date on the line.

STATEMENTS. Please tick ALL the Statements that you are willing to support. Do not tick any Statements that you do not want to be seen supporting, for political or fear, reasons, etc. Thank you.

[.......] Statement 1: I have heard of Mr Robert HO.

[.......] Statement 2: I have heard of Mr Robert HO for more than 1 year.

[.......] Statement 3: I have heard of Mr Robert HO for many years.

[.......] Statement 4: Mr Robert HO and his family members have been under electronic surveillance in his country of Singapore as well as elsewhere when they travel abroad.

[.......] Statement 5: Such surveillance in Statement 4 above are done for hostile reasons, not benign reasons.

[.......] Statement 6: Such surveillance in Statements 4 and 5 above are also committed in order to broadcast Mr Robert HO and his family members LIVE on the internet.

[.......] Statement 7: Such LIVE internet broadcasts, as in Statement 6 above, are committed 24/7, that is, 24 hours a day, nonstop.

[.......] Statement 8: Such LIVE internet broadcasts, as in Statement 7 above, are against the will of Mr Robert HO and his family members.

[.......] Statement 9: In addition to such 24/7 LIVE internet broadcasts, as in Statement 8 above, of Mr Robert HO and his family members, many of his properties have also been criminally vandalised.

[.......] Statement 10: Such vandalised properties, in Statement 9 above, include his wife's car, various home appliances and electronic equipment including their home computers.

[.......] Statement 11: Mr Robert HO's body has also been attacked with sophisticated through-the-ceiling x-rays or similar penetrating rays, to cause various pains and ill effects in his body organs.

[.......] Statement 12: Such attacks, as in Statement 11 above, have also been committed on his son and also his niece.

[.......] Statement 13: Mr Robert HO's bedroom sex coitus with his wife are also broadcast on the internet.

[.......] Statement 14: Mr Robert HO's sex coitus with his wife are also subject to various interference with sophisticated electronic equipments.

[.......] Statement 15: Mr Robert HO has also been deliberately made sick from lab-cultivated flu viruses secretly put into his food and drinks.

[.......] Statement 16: Such flu attacks, as in Statement 15 above, have also been committed on his son and his niece.

[.......] Statement 17: Shit has also been secretly put into Mr Robert HO's food.

[.......] Statement 18: Such attacks and internet LIVE broadcasts of Mr Robert HO and his family members began around 1992 and are still ongoing.

[.......] Statement 19: I am aware that Mr Robert HO has documented some of these criminal attacks in his 2 blogs, namely:

“I came, I saw, I solved it” at url web page address http://i-came-i-saw-i-solved-it.blogspot.com/

“I came, I saw, I wrote it: at url web page address http://i-came-i-saw-i-wrote-it.blogspot.com/

[.......] Statement 20: I am aware of Mr Robert HO's daily emails sent out from his Gmail email account “robert.ic019@gmail.com” and the general contents of his daily emails.

[.......] Statement 21: I have personally read some of Mr Robert HO's emails as in Statement 20 above.

[.......] Statement 22: Mr Robert HO is also subjected to criminal threats that threaten to harm his son.




…...........................................
Name



…...........................................
Signature



…...........................................
Occupation,
for example, “President”; “Prime Minister”; “Minister”; “Journalist”; “Film/TV director”; “Actor/Actress”; etc, etc.



…...........................................
Country



…...........................................
Official stamp, if any



…...........................................
Date
Posted by Robert HO nric S0197974D at 14:52 
Labels: 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 25 December 2011

Revisited from 2008 on degree mills, fake degrees and Singapore Businessmen

at Salary.sg – Your Salary in Singapore

 

« None of this year’s President’s Scholars doing Engineering
How many people made 6-figure salaries last year? »

Beware Of People Who Claim To Have “Doctorates”

August 30th, 2008
advertisement
Shrewd businessmen are buying degrees from degree mills and passing themselves off as “Dr” so-and-so.
Straits Times journalist Sandra Davie even managed to buy a degree for her dog! (ST, August 29, 2008).
Yes, Harry Doggy the cute beagle is now officially a “Doctor of Arts”. For just US$599.
Other people spent years slogging to get a PhD and “Dr” Harry didn’t even move a fingerpaw to be conferred a doctorate.
So who are the famous people in Singapore with degrees that are similar to “Dr” Harry Doggy’s? Straits Times mentioned the following:
  • Expressions International founder “Dr” Theresa Chew.
  • Bread Talk founder “Dr” George Quek.
  • “Dr” T. Chandroo who runs 60 Montessori kindergartens.
  • “Dr” Clemen Chiang who runs options trading seminars.
I remember Clemen Chiang even called his degree-mill alma mata “the prestigious Preston University” in his ads. Now, we all know Preston is a virtual university that gives out PhDs freely for a fee.
What’s worse is that Clemen Chiang is also “widely quoted in the local press”, including the Business Times (see example). Given BT’s past record of uncovering at least one case of people who lied / misled about their credentials (see discussion about the famous Dennis Lee case and article in Time magazine), I don’t know why BT did not do more diligence and still invited “Dr” Chiang to write in its columns.
More from the very enlightening ST article:
“Mr Chiang sheepishly admits that he continues to use his doctorate as it helps to pave the way in business… But he added: ‘But I am thinking of dropping my doctorate title altogether until I complete the current PhD I am working on with the University of South Australia.’ “
Er… which University of South Australia is he referring to? Let’s hope it’s the legitimate one and not another degree mill.
Update (6 Sep 2008): Preston wrote to ST and took up a full-page ad announcing the “factual errors” in that ST article and “superficial” research done by ST. Nothing surprising – they’re just protecting their business interests. In the same vein, T. Chandroo also wrote to ST Forum and wished for people to understand his “disappointment”. The ST editor retorted:
“For over a month, Mr Chandroo’s secretary said he was ‘too busy’ to answer e-mails or calls… Preston University is not accredited by any US Department of Education-recognised accrediting body. The state of Oregon refers to Preston University as a ‘degree supplier’ and has named it on its list of unapproved schools… In 2001, the US-based Chronicle of Higher Education reported that Preston University had listed faculty members who had nothing to do with the institution (a fact later admitted by Preston)…”
1
This entry was posted on Saturday, August 30th, 2008 at 1:50 pm and is filed under Education,Other Money Matters. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

View more comments at Salary.sg Forums


21 Responses to “Beware of People who claim to have “Doctorates””


  1. Jonathan Wong Says: 
    August 30th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
    Haha… yeah, I lived through the whole Dennis Lee incident when I was working at Elipva many years ago. The guy went beyond just embellishing his credentials – he was flat out a compulsive and pathological liar.
    In fact, many of the employees on the ground (admittedly, not me) suspected something long ago already, but it’s not always easy to accuse your director of something like that. It also didn’t help that Singapore at that time was especially desperate to find a local Internet hometown hero which it can rally behind. Perhaps that may of led to a few “closed eyes” I believe.
    You have to give the guy an A++ for effort – he even used his own money to print out copies of his fake books and made his own fake plaques!

  2. saga Says: 
    August 30th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
    i want to buy. still have a not?
    buy and frame it up looks nice too.

  3. loverpearl Says: 
    August 30th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
    hahaha… my boss is also one of them who is not only Dr but also xxxx (sorry can’t reveal much, least I got sued. Want to know why, then read my blog). He has many friends who did the same also. He even laughed about the article yesterday when speaking to his manager.

  4. Collin Says: 
    August 30th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
    I think all the students from “Dr” Clemen’s classes do have a case against him.

  5. Dr. AC Says: 
    August 30th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
    Yea, I hate ppl who have get a Dr without going through all the pain. That is because I got my Dr. through slogging hard, on a lousy stipend, with full of stress and alone in a lab for 3.5 yrs. (My PhD is from UNSW btw, so it’s not fake. Admin, I think University of South Australia is genuine…but then again different fields demand different rigour so it really depends..)
    Going through all that hard work to get a PhD and not being well recognized in Singapore is demoralizing enough (I really am comtemplating migrating), we don’t need fake wannabes to rub it our face. Kudos to those who really earned their PhD, they really have substance and really deserved their recognition.
    If you want to know what hard work you need to put in to get your PhD, let me know. I will be glad to share. Just a heads up, my supervisor asked me to “join a social club” before I start my PhD, so that gives you a hint on how hard it can be.

  6. e Says: 
    August 31st, 2008 at 2:54 pm
    i do not know why people are so enamoured by PhD and Dr this and that. if anything – it will just make me sceptical if someone tries to spruce their “credentials” in business. a phd is only necessary in research and academia and in those fields, you would imagine that people do have a semblance of what degrees are credible. in business/finance? no way – maybe in quant finance that’s about it.
    Also, absolutely hate it when people sign their business cards with John Tan, B.Com, BSc, and FCSPA, and all other funny letters past their name – i suspect that is more of a ploy to impress heartlanders than anything.
    Also, I don’t agree with Dr AC, on all PhD’s who have “substance and deserve their reconition” – it all depends on the rigor and in what field. In my disciple – I don’t think a PhD is hard to get at all.
    Btw, I’m not in academia and not in Singapore. My industry’s/countries views on PhDs outside the fields of academia and research will probably mirror mine.

  7. Dr. AC Says: 
    August 31st, 2008 at 8:41 pm
    Dear e,
    May I know what discipline are you in such that it makes you say that a PhD is not hard to get ?
    Also I like to gently point out that I didnt say ALL Phds have substance and deserve their recognition. I merely said those who earned their PhDs.
    Maybe it’s true that not all disciplines require rigourous work. However, for hard sciences and engineering they do. Also, I think I should point out that there is a difference between a DBA and a PhD, both upon completion, will confer the title of Dr. To my knowledge, I believe that DBA is more applicable to the business industry than a PhD. However, I am not sure about the rigour of work that DBA demands.
    Fair enough, is not required for the business industry; ppl who sincerely do their PhD usually do it out of interest and the pursuit of knowledge and nothing else. There are other skills to be gained whilst doing a PhD. Success in business work rely on pure performance and of course luck. A few cases of successful non-business PhD holders are Jack Welch and Dr Cheong Choong Kong of OCBC Bank. But I don’t think they use the titles to get there.
    Most ppl who get honorary PhDs (PhDs that do not require you to submit a thesis) are doing it to get the title. It’s a status thing, not something out of pure interest.

  8. e Says: 
    September 1st, 2008 at 10:32 am
    Discipline is finance/economics – as I’ve mentioned, i don’t think it is hard a PhD (not DBA which I have no clue about)in my field at all. just study a few more years and write a few more papres and get published. I’m talking about PhD’s here – where you are expected to submit a peer reviewed thesis and to notionally “contribute to the body of knowledge”.
    Like you said – people who do their PhD’s do so out of interest + pursuit of knowledge. However, you get three-five years to write a thesis and if your supervisor is any good – you should expect to pass (maybe not with distinction – but a pass nonetheless)
    In academia as well – you also need luck to make it famous – instead if languishing on page 89 of some obscure journal.
    On honorary PhDs – you don’t “get one” unless you are someone prominent in the community. Granted – another “back door” way is to donate a huge amount of money to the school and you sould get one as well… lol. Like you said – its a status thing but i sure would prefer an honorary one than a real one…

  9. Dr. AC Says: 
    September 1st, 2008 at 2:09 pm
    Dear e,
    It seems to me you have a very strong prejudice against PhD per se.
    I dunno about PhD in pure finance and economics, what they require and all. As to your claims on “just study a few more years and write a few more papres and get published”, I don’t think its that simple. A lot people I know drop out of PhD or fail them because they can hardly publish anything. The requirements of PhD looks deceptively, emphasis on deceptively, simple.
    The difficulty of PhD are as follows:
    1. The meaning of PhD is to introduce a new philosophy (not application) to way things are being done in the world today. Philosophy can translate to design theory, models and the like. Thus, having novelty + stamping your claim on it is extremely difficult. Masters and Bachelor degrees are not required to have philosophical novelty. That said, I am not sure if most honorary PhDs have introduced some form of philosophical novelty in their fields. If they have, I respect them and they deserved their PhD.
    2. Writing a paper and a thesis is not as easy as it seems. Having good results does not mean writing good papers, i.e., have good positive experimental results does not mean you can publish. Publishing a journal paper requires a lot of thought and formal wording. The hardest portions to write in a journal paper are the classifications, your theory and the introduction. Especially the introduction. It’s takes a long thought and writing process to hatch a journal. It’s an even longer time for a thesis, so I hope you can respect and am aware of that. Maybe you can try writing solid journal paper to realize the difficulty of it.
    In academia you do need luck to be famous, luck in finding the relevant topics + industrial funding. Usually they get famous at conferences, where it is easier to display their results.
    Journals are meant for people in the community, and in the industry so it may not be of value to people outside of the community. Thats the purpose of it.
    PhD does have its value, and great things can come out of it. People like Rudolf Kalman, Claude Shannon, R.A. Fisher have come up with great things for engineering and IT.
    Of course some may laugh at Robert Merton, Myron Scholes and Fischer Black, who are PhD Nobel Laureates, E Derman for the introduction of Quantitative Finance with the collapse of LTCM ( in fact it’s collapse is not totally due to their mathematical models). IMHO, I think people who think this way are small, jealous, ignorant and short sighted, cos it’s only one extreme case out of many (who criticises D.E.Shaw and Citadel?). If not for these people, I dont’ think there be as big a market for derivatives and MFE programs.

  10. e Says: 
    September 1st, 2008 at 4:38 pm
    Prejudices: Not PhD’s per se. But more in the context of people who spruik their credentials indiscriminately. Doesn’t have to be a PhD but even those with their numerous lettering at the back of their names. More so for people who are actually enamoured by academic credentials…
    Honarary PhDs: I don’t think there has be any “philosophical novelty” for them to awarded these degrees. As I said, all you have to do is either be famous or donate a lot of money to the school.
    Publishing journals: Thanks but no thanks. I took a first writing my honours thesis which I chose not to publish. Could have enrolled in a direct PhD straight away but refrained. Actually, come to think of it, that first paper could be one of many papers to form the thesis. Some people I know did and have since gotten their PhDs though they were realistic enough to know that they shouldn’t expect a “PhD premium” if they were coming out to the finance marketplace to get work…
    Anyway, the moral of the story is, which I have always reiterated is that PhD are only needed in research and/or academia. A lot of good things have come out of research – probably more so in the hard sciences than in the social sciences/arts.
    Back to the topic… a PhD is not relevant in business – so you should be most wary of people who try to use fancy titles to impress you…

  11. Careerwork Says: 
    September 6th, 2008 at 10:23 am
    If you want a title in front, do you know that under the Singapore Law, Professional Engineer is given a title “Er” just like doctor ? Unfortunately, not many people still know. It is a glamorous status and not easily to obtain. Have to be awarded by the Professional Engineer Board. Check out http://www.peb.gov.sg

  12. singapore options trader Says: 
    September 7th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
    I congratulate ST Senior Writer Sandra Davie for exposing businessmen such as Chandroo and most importantly Clemen Chiang as a fraud.
    Clemen in particular openly uses his PhD/Doctoral qualification to boost his credentials and recruit students for his courses.
    Now that his PhD is proven to be from Preston University, a degree mill university, he should openly apologies to the public and the various media entity such as Business Times, CAN, CNBC and many others that he has been able to manipulate to give him the publicity as published widely in his website at www .freely .com
    He has no shame when openly admitted that he got his PhD in 16 months. This is unprecedented and no reputable university would award such as doctoral qualification. He should get his doctoral supervisor who is presumably an expert in options trading to openly testify to his so called well earned qualification and published his thesis.
    University of South Australia should be wary and rejected such doctoral students. Perhaps UniSA and/or APMI Kaplan Singapore being the local provider would comment.
    Despite being exposed that his PhD is from a degree mill, he still advertise in the newspapers and in his website carrying his “Dr” title. This should be put to a stop!!!
    It is time for the students (past and present) take him to task. He has cheated many students which resulted in him owning his bungalows at Sentosa Cove and elsewhere and many cars he owned as he always brag during his Seminar Previews.
    Speak up fellow student. The time is now….

  13. supportthetruth Says: 
    September 17th, 2008 at 9:51 pm
    Chandroo, what will you tell the preschoolers?

  14. fake doctors Says: 
    October 19th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
    Admin thank you for pointing out these fraudsters. May I add that my friend used to work for Teresa Chew, lady boss of Expressions, and he said she was ADAMANT in making sure everyone called her ‘doctor chew’
    Any Expression employee can attest to that. Such a shame that it’s just an ego boost totally undeserved in the end.

  15. More Preston CEOs Says: 
    January 24th, 2010 at 11:40 pm
    Again more in the context of people who are into window dressing on their credentials indiscriminately. Thanks to Admin for pointing them out and there are a few more not listed.
    Found one more. It is one of the FTs in Singapore education scene recently spotted on Business Times page as “Singapore-based” FT group Global Indian Foundation. The CEO is “Dr MANEESH TRIPATHI: Maneesh has a PhD in Humanistic Sciences from Preston University, Wyoming U.S.” (http://www-07.ibm.com/events/nz/forum06/bios/). Preston University is a Pakistan based degree mill which we read from Strait Times as one of the leading fakes.
    Amazing is how can these CEO with fake PHD can deliver high profile international education and not get caught ?
    How many more remaining to be pointed out ? It is such a shame and totally undeserved.

  16. IAFM Says: 
    February 13th, 2010 at 5:04 pm
    Does anybody here have comments on IAFM http://www.iafm.eu/ ?
    Their web page has an alert saying “Dubai training offices terminated” and “FAKE IAFM CERTIFICATES FROM DUBAI OR ASIA ARE FRAUDULENT AND UNAUTHORIZED”.
    Anything known about IAFM Singapore operations ?

  17. happy Says: 
    March 12th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
    Mr Maneesh Tripathi f/k/a Dr Maneesh Tripathi has quit as CEO of education business, now appointed CEO of MediaRing.
    I am happy to disclose that I don’t own MediaRing stock and no plan to.

  18. solo Says: 
    April 20th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
    Remember back in 2007 that Bryan Lim was sued by Credit Suisse for misappropriating client’s fund and also providing fake credentials about a law degree from University in London & an MBA from UCLA?

  19. James Tho Says: 
    December 8th, 2010 at 9:28 pm
    In reply to number 16 this website is a fake posted by a US based conman known as George Mentz who owns a certificate mill in the US called the American Academy of Financial Management. Mentz was recently exposed as a fraud by the Wall Street Journalhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703927504575540582361440848.html
    Mentz’s singaporean associates have recently been reported to to Corrupt Practices investigation Board for data theft

  20. I2I Says: 
    February 9th, 2011 at 5:56 pm
    Re: No. 15
    Mr Maneesh Tripathi CEO left Global Indian International School and moved to Spice I2I Pte Ltd. This is same as Media Ring M09.SI previously.
    Stock performance over last 1 year
    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=M09.SI&t=1y
    Many factors of course for any company performance, CEO is just one factor.

  21. I2I penny Says: 
    July 14th, 2011 at 3:33 pm
    @ I2I information “Mr Maneesh Tripathi CEO left Global Indian International School and moved to Spice I2I Pte Ltd.” is ok but Mr Maneesh Tripathi was on both.
    >>>>>>>
    Chief Executive Officer (group) at Spice i2i (Public listed at SGX Singapore), Governing Board member (hon) at Global Indian Foundation and Global Indian International Schools
    Past:
    COO and Integration Executive at IBM ISS, Business Unit head Asia pacific- IBM Global Services at IBM Global Business Services, General Manager Sales at IBM India, Country manager at Thakral computers
    Education:
    Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya
    Summary:
    A Global citizen who has worked in 3 continents, learnt, and still learning, how to manage various cultures and unique country/regional specific challenges in each continent. Have run billion dollar plus listed companies, (as MD, CEO and BU head) clearly understanding business management, governance and people management. Creates value for stakeholders. Prides on taking responsibility and carrying out commitments fearlessly, but not recklessly
    <<<<<
    Last month Business Times reported Mr Maneesh will resign as CEO of Spice i2i and move to Affinity group as MD.
    Other appointments: Governing Board member, Global Indian Foundationhttp://www.globalindian.org.sg/Default.aspx?tabid=4581
    According to my friend IIM Calcultta is one of the top ranking B-school in East of India and IIM grads will feel insulted to carry the title of PhD from Preston University because they know it is a Pakistan degree mill university.

View more comments at Salary.sg Forums


Leave a Reply

 
 
 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)